Non-Refundable Deposit Stated in Real Estate Purchase Contract in California Deemed Invalid by the Courts
The Kuish case involved a $620,000 escrow deposit for the purchase of a $14 million oceanfront home in Laguna Beach. Instead of using a liquidated damages provision, the buyer and sellers merely agreed in the purchase contract that the deposit would be "nonrefundable." According to the trial court, both parties were "big boys," meaning that they were "sophisticated business people [who] understood all the ramifications of their actions in freely negotiating to make the [deposit] non-refundable."
The buyer eventually cancelled the agreement. The sellers refused to return the deposit to the buyer, even though they sold the property to someone else for $1 million more.
The buyer sued to recover the $620,000 deposit, and won on appeal. The court stated that "any provision by which money or property would be forfeited without regard to actual damage suffered would be an unenforceable penalty. To construe the term 'nonrefundable' to establish [the sellers'] entitlement to the full deposit without regard to actual damages would essentially create a liquidated damages provision." Yet, the parties in this case did not separately sign or initial a liquidated damages provision.
Harrison K. Long, Realtor & broker, Explore Group, Coldwell Banker Previews, Irvine, CA. CA DRE #01410855. ExploreProperties@gmail.com. Lawyer member of the California State Bar Association - State Bar number 69137. Helping People with their Best Decisions About Real Estate at Orange County, California.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home